Oracle breaks with tech industry to back sex trafficking legislation

Cloud computing behemoth Oracle has broken off from the standard tech sector line and decided to back a bipartisan proposal in the US Congress that would make it easier to penalize operators of websites that facilitate online sex trafficking.

The technology sector has, thus far, been firmly opposed to the legislation on the grounds that it would strangle innovation and lead to endless litigation.

“Your legislation does not, as suggested by the bill’s opponents, usher the end of the internet,” Kenneth Glueck, Oracle senior vice president, wrote in a letter to Republican Senator Rob Portman and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, chief architects of the proposal. “If enacted, it will establish some measure of accountability for those that cynically sell advertising but are unprepared to help curtail sex trafficking,” he continued.

The legislation would open up the potential for state legislators and victims to pursue legal action against Facebook, Google and other big tech giants if their measures to limit exploitative material are found to be insufficient.

This news came at the same time a new report was released which showed that tech entrepreneurs generally have very Democratic values, except when it comes to regulation. The report from the Stanford Business School suggested that when it comes to regulation tech entrepreneurs are as right-wing as Republican party donors, while being as left-wing as Democrat party donors on almost every other issue.

That being said, it would be fair to suggest that regulation has the potential to unduly affect the tech sector. It’s a sector often misunderstood by those less “tech-savvy”, who may well be lawmakers, and the pace of innovation is firstly very high and secondly part of the sectors identity. But while this might explain the sectors adversity to regulation it does not speak to how valid any individual regulation might be.

One point to consider in the latest case is that Oracle and Google have been rivals in a lawsuit that lasted six years – or seven, depending on whether you think it’s still going. Oracle runs cloud-based CRM-type systems for businesses to store data and processes, so is unlikely to be much affected by legislation which speaks to consumer advertising. It is conceivable that this move from Oracle is just the latest in its propensity to try and stitch up Google.

Ben Allen

Ben Allen is a traveller, a millennial and a Brit. He worked in the London startup world for a while but really prefers commenting on it than working in it. He has huge faith in the tech industry and enjoys talking and writing about the social issues inherent in its development.

Recent Posts

Gates-funded World Bank project seeks to connect digital ID with fast payment systems

The public-private financial revolution requires every person to have a digital identity, so they can…

4 hours ago

Tony Colon to keynote Articulate conference alongside industry execs, share best practices for leading in an AI-first future

At the outset of 2025, digital workflow platform ServiceNow revealed plans to hire up to…

3 days ago

Digital ID, face scans for age verification are becoming internet passports

Online age checks are not just about children; they're about getting everybody onboard with digital…

3 days ago

15 startup conferences that are actually worth attending in 2025

Big-name expos and star-studded keynotes may grab headlines, but in 2025, it’s the smaller, more…

4 days ago

US wants digital ID for patients, providers & payers

Trump says the system will be 'entirely opt-in,' but HHS is looking to encourage, require…

2 weeks ago

Why a proactive approach to threat exposure pays dividends 

Over the past year, not only has the frequency of cyberattacks skyrocketed across all industries…

2 weeks ago